zooptech2011@gmail.com

Indonesia

Indonesia Releases Draft Guidelines for Halal Assurance System in Cosmetics: Bi-Annual Ingredient Reporting and Annual Internal Audits Required

On June 3, 2026, Indonesia submitted a Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) notification (Notification No. G/TBT/N/IDN/187) to the World Trade Organization (WTO), soliciting public comments on its newly drafted “Guidelines for the Implementation of the Halal Assurance System for Cosmetics”. The public consultation period closed on August 2, 2026. Below is a detailed breakdown of the core requirements outlined in the draft decree to assist cosmetic exporters and industry stakeholders in navigating compliance. I. Core Definitions and Conceptual Framework The draft guidelines establish essential definitions governing halal cosmetic compliance: II. Halal Access Requirements for Cosmetic Raw Materials Enterprises must possess valid Halal Certificates or equivalent supporting halal documentation recognized by the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH). Controlled substances encompass not only active and inactive ingredients but also auxiliary processing inputs: 1. Scope of Controlled Substances The scope covers raw materials, additives, processing aids, substances on the production line with

Indonesia Releases Draft Guidelines for Halal Assurance System in Cosmetics: Bi-Annual Ingredient Reporting and Annual Internal Audits Required Read More »

EU

The EU PPWR Packaging Regulation Is Coming: Cosmetic Enterprises Must Prepare Now

The European Union cosmetic industry is standing at a critical turning point. As the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) begins taking effect across EU member states in August 2026, all enterprises manufacturing, importing, or selling cosmetics in the EU market will face unprecedented packaging compliance challenges. I. What Is PPWR and Why Must Cosmetic Enterprises Pay Attention? The PPWR is the EU’s latest packaging regulation designed to comprehensively overhaul the European packaging management framework, accelerating the shift toward environmentally friendly, highly circular packaging design and usage. Core Objectives Include: Directive vs. Regulation: Unlike the previous Packaging Directive (94/62/EC), the PPWR is a Regulation. This means it is directly applicable and legally binding in all 27 EU Member States simultaneously, establishing a unified legal framework without requiring national transposition laws. II. How Deeply Will PPWR Impact the Cosmetics Industry? Given its structural complexity, diverse material usage, and frequent inclusion of

The EU PPWR Packaging Regulation Is Coming: Cosmetic Enterprises Must Prepare Now Read More »

USA

2026 Cosmetic Market Access & MoCRA Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

As one of the world’s most attractive and massive cosmetic markets, the United States—driven by its vast consumer base, vibrant domestic industry, and open reception to international brands—has always been a strategic stronghold for global beauty enterprises expanding their overseas footprint. However, opportunities come hand in hand with challenges. As modern U.S. cosmetic regulations advance, market entry barriers are undergoing their most profound transformation in decades. How can brands navigate compliance obligations and avoid regulatory red lines prior to commercialization? This guide provides an in-depth breakdown of the latest core compliance essentials for entering the U.S. cosmetic market. I. What is MoCRA? A New Era in U.S. Beauty Regulation The Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) represents the most historically significant restructuring of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) regulatory authority over cosmetics in decades. The implementation of MoCRA marks a decisive shift in U.S. oversight from

2026 Cosmetic Market Access & MoCRA Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide Read More »

EU

Expanding into the EU Cosmetic Market: Are You Prepared for These Testing Requirements?

As Chinese beauty brands surge in global popularity, an increasing number of companies are setting their sights on overseas expansion, with the European market standing out as a highly lucrative destination. However, the European Union is renowned within the industry for enforcing some of the world’s most rigorous cosmetic regulations. Before any product sets foot on European soil, brand owners must ensure it is safe for human health, fully documented, and strictly compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 (the EU Cosmetics Regulation). Testing is an indispensable milestone throughout this intricate compliance journey. A foundational yet critical question frequently asked by expanding brands is: “What testing is mandatory before my product can be launched in the EU?” The precise answer is: It depends. The EU does not prescribe a rigid, one-size-fits-all “testing checklist.” Testing requirements fluctuate depending on formula matrix, product category, microbiological susceptibility, packaging materials, target audience, intended use, and

Expanding into the EU Cosmetic Market: Are You Prepared for These Testing Requirements? Read More »

UK

Claiming to “Look Up to 5 Years Younger”? UK Advertising Regulator Banishes Ad from Renowned Skincare Brand

The specific case behind this ruling involves Beiersdorf UK Ltd, trading as the well-known skincare brand Eucerin. On April 29, 2026, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a challenge against a prominent billboard advertisement at Balham Tube station in London for the Eucerin Hyaluron-Filler Epigenetic Serum. The ad featured the headline claim “LOOK UP TO 5 YEARS YOUNGER”* alongside the text “CLINICALLY PROVEN.” An analysis of the official case document details the specific clinical flaws exposed by the ASA and provides actionable compliance lessons for global cosmetics exporters. I. Inside the ASA’s Scientific Evidentiary Audit Eucerin attempted to justify the headline claim by submitting four internal studies and one peer-reviewed paper. The ASA’s systematic critique highlights the exact reasons why the evidence collapsed under regulatory scrutiny: 1. The 1-Year Skin Age Gap vs. Subjective Bias The primary study submitted by the brand tracked 160 volunteers over 4 weeks. However,

Claiming to “Look Up to 5 Years Younger”? UK Advertising Regulator Banishes Ad from Renowned Skincare Brand Read More »